← New Consensus projects
RESEARCH EDITION 02 DATA SNAPSHOT · NOVEMBER 2026

AI Build-Out
Visualization
Project

The AI boom is taking physical shape. See the buildings, machines, money and resources behind it.

Explore the buildout
96documented AI sites
15.1 GWestimated current IT capacity
2023–26the boom in view
00The big picture

Put the whole industry next to a city.

The world’s data centers occupy an estimated 1.4 Manhattans of powered land and use as much electricity annually as 9.7 New York Cities. Their annual water footprint has the volume of about 149 days of NYC’s water supply.

Worldwide data-center sector, including AI. These totals put the buildout in context. They include other computing and pre-boom facilities; the evidence years differ. A complete global AI-only total is not yet available.

Aggregate worldwide data-center scale: 20,000 acres of modeled powered facility land at end 2024, about 1.4 Manhattans; 485 TWh of electricity in 2025, 55.4 average GW or 9.7 New York Cities; 560 billion liters of water consumption in 2023, equivalent to 149 days of NYC water supply, including about 37 days for direct cooling. Whole sector including AI, not AI-only.Aggregate worldwide data-center scale: 20,000 acres of modeled powered facility land at end 2024, about 1.4 Manhattans; 485 TWh of electricity in 2025, 55.4 average GW or 9.7 New York Cities; 560 billion liters of water consumption in 2023, equivalent to 149 days of NYC water supply, including about 37 days for direct cooling. Whole sector including AI, not AI-only.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

Land means facility sites. The acreage is Hines’s model of powered land under operating data centers, rather than building floor space. It is not a survey of entire acquired campuses, buffers or reserved expansion land. A complete worldwide campus-acreage total remains unknown.

Water means consumption. The 560-billion-liter footprint includes cooling, energy supply and chip manufacturing. About one-quarter is direct cooling. NYC’s benchmark is water delivered to the city, so the comparison shows an equivalent volume—not equal withdrawals or equal local water stress.

Sources, dates and the arithmetic behind the city comparisons

These are worldwide sector estimates, rather than sums of our 96 AI-site records. Their evidence years differ: land is end-2024, electricity is 2025, and water is 2023. They include infrastructure that predates the AI boom. They cannot be presented as an AI-only total or as net construction since 2023.

Reproduce each comparison
MeasureGlobal estimateCity benchmarkCalculation
Powered facility land20,000 acres, end-2024Manhattan: 22.7 square miles × 640 acres20,000 ÷ 14,528 = 1.38 Manhattans
Annual electricity485 TWh, 2025NYC: approximately 50 TWh/year485 ÷ 50 = 9.7 NYC equivalents
Average electrical demand55.4 GWNYC: approximately 5.7 GW485 TWh ÷ 8,760 hours × 1,000 = 55.4 GW
Annual water consumption560 billion liters, 2023NYC: 363.4 billion US gallons delivered in 2025560 ÷ 3.785411784 ÷ 363.4 × 365 = 148.6 supply-days
Direct cooling componentApproximately 140 billion litersThe same NYC supply benchmarkAbout one-quarter of the water total = 37.1 supply-days

The water calendar shows one year of NYC supply volume, with approximately 37 days colored for cooling and 112 for indirect consumption. These components are rounded estimates. A skyline represents annual electricity demand, not population or peak generation capacity. The land squares have proportional areas.

Sources: Hines Research, September 2025, p. 3; IEA, 2026 electricity outlook; IEA, Energy and AI, pp. 242–243. City benchmarks: US Census, NYC Comptroller and NYC DEP. Download inputs and calculations.

01Geography

A global buildout. An uneven view.

Our documented sample spans 12 countries. Most records are in the United States; the map shows where this inventory has evidence, not every place AI infrastructure exists.

World map highlighting the 12 countries represented in the 96-site sample. 77 records are in the US and 19 are elsewhere. Unhighlighted countries have no records in this sample, not necessarily no AI sites.World map highlighting the 12 countries represented in the 96-site sample. 77 records are in the US and 19 are elsewhere. Unhighlighted countries have no records in this sample, not necessarily no AI sites.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG
77United States
5China
4Malaysia
2Norway
1Australia
1Finland
1Iceland
1Indonesia
1Portugal
1Sweden
1United Arab Emirates
1United Kingdom

Source: Epoch AI site inventory, November 1, 2026. Country boundaries: Natural Earth. Site records may encompass several buildings.

02The accumulated buildout

Completed does not mean gone.

Once a site starts operating, its capacity remains in the picture. Dated estimates for the current cohort record growth from 0.40 GW at the end of 2023 to 15.08 GW in November 2026. Earlier records are incomplete, so this is a history of the tracked cohort, not a worldwide growth rate.

Estimated recorded IT capacity in the current cohort: 0.067 GW at end 2022, 0.401 in 2023, 2.015 in 2024, 6.789 in 2025, and 15.078 on November 1, 2026. Earlier records are incomplete.Estimated recorded IT capacity in the current cohort: 0.067 GW at end 2022, 0.401 in 2023, 2.015 in 2024, 6.789 in 2025, and 15.078 on November 1, 2026. Earlier records are incomplete.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

76 sites with positive current estimates. These may include operating buildings on campuses that are still expanding.

20 with no positive current capacity. Their ultimate size and cost are not zero; future capacity is excluded from the operating total.

Historical checkpoints and counting method

At each checkpoint, we sum the last dated IT-capacity estimate for each site. The cohort stays fixed at the 96 sites in the current snapshot. A site without an earlier record contributes no recorded capacity at that date; this does not establish that it had no physical capacity. Future-dated estimates are excluded. These stock estimates are not a sum of all investment or of all capacity additions.

Historical observations in the current cohort
DateRecorded IT capacitySites with positive estimatesSites with dated records
2022-12-310.067 GW225
2023-12-310.401 GW647
2024-12-312.015 GW2279
2025-12-316.789 GW4795
2026-11-0115.078 GW7696

Source: analysis of Epoch AI dated site records. Download the checkpoints.

03Machines

A million H100s’ worth of performance.

Colossus 2 has the equivalent of roughly 1.11 million H100 GPUs in Epoch’s current estimate. An H100 equivalent compares theoretical computing performance across different chips; it does not mean a site contains that many physical H100s.

The ten highest estimated computing capacities in the sample, led by Colossus 2 at 1.11 million H100 equivalents and Stargate Abilene at 1.02 million.The ten highest estimated computing capacities in the sample, led by Colossus 2 at 1.11 million H100 equivalents and Stargate Abilene at 1.02 million.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

Source: Epoch AI. Performance is based on theoretical dense 8-bit operations, not observed application throughput. Hardware mixes are often inferred. Read the estimation method.

04Capital

The price of filling the buildings.

The dollar scale includes servers and networking as well as the facility. These comparable estimates put Amazon’s New Carlisle site at about $39.3 billion. They describe modeled capital, not a disclosed invoice, financing deal or annual spending figure.

The ten highest modeled capital costs in the sample, led by New Carlisle at 39.3 billion 2025 dollars, Colossus 2 at 35.8 billion, and Abilene at 31.2 billion.The ten highest modeled capital costs in the sample, led by New Carlisle at 39.3 billion 2025 dollars, Colossus 2 at 35.8 billion, and Abilene at 31.2 billion.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

The cost chart and the power figures share an input: Epoch models capital cost from IT power. They are not independent measurements.

Source: Epoch AI capital-cost methodology, November 2026 snapshot. All values in 2025 US dollars.

05Electricity

From campus loads to a global energy demand.

The tracked sites total 15.1 GW of estimated IT capacity. To see the wider electricity context, the IEA estimates that all data centers used 485 TWh in 2025 and projects 950 TWh in 2030. Those global totals include AI and other computing.

IEA global data-center electricity demand: 485 TWh estimated for 2025 and 950 TWh projected for 2030, nearly doubling. These are all-workload totals, not AI-only totals.IEA global data-center electricity demand: 485 TWh estimated for 2025 and 950 TWh projected for 2030, nearly doubling. These are all-workload totals, not AI-only totals.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

MW tells us how much power. IT capacity covers equipment; cooling and other facility overhead add to the full electrical demand.

TWh tells us how much energy over time. A constant 1 GW load for a 365-day year uses 8.76 TWh. Actual demand varies with utilization and overhead.

Source: IEA, Key Questions on Energy and AI (2026). These global estimates are a different dataset from the campus inventory.

06Physical footprint

Think in square miles.

Meta’s original Louisiana site boundary covered 2,250 acres, about 3.5 square miles. Microsoft’s initial Fairwater campus in Wisconsin covered 315 acres, about half a square mile. The square areas below use the same scale.

Area-proportional squares compare the original 2,250-acre Meta Richland Parish site with the initial 315-acre Microsoft Fairwater Wisconsin campus. Later expansions are excluded.Area-proportional squares compare the original 2,250-acre Meta Richland Parish site with the initial 315-acre Microsoft Fairwater Wisconsin campus. Later expansions are excluded.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

Sources: Louisiana Economic Development, January 8, 2025; Microsoft, September 18, 2025. These are dated land boundaries, not floor space or the full extent of later expansions.

07Water

A billion gallons, at a named place.

Google reported consuming 1.346 billion gallons at its Council Bluffs location in 2025. Its location-level disclosures give us a view that is often missing elsewhere. They cover all workloads at each reporting location; the portion attributable to AI is not disclosed.

Eight largest reported 2025 water-consumption totals among named Google locations. Council Bluffs leads at 1,346 million gallons and Mayes County follows at 1,081.4 million gallons.Eight largest reported 2025 water-consumption totals among named Google locations. Council Bluffs leads at 1,346 million gallons and Mayes County follows at 1,081.4 million gallons.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG
See all 40 named locations

Million gallons during 2025. Consumption is withdrawal minus discharge. Seawater and brackish water are excluded. Low totals can reflect new or partly operating facilities, not just cooling efficiency. See the original report’s footnotes for site-specific conditions.

Google’s reported 2025 water use
LocationWithdrawalConsumption
Council Bluffs, IA1,746.41,346
Mayes County, OK1,396.71,081.4
Berkeley County, SC988.5901.7
New Albany, OH1,008.1835.7
Papillion, NE677.8548.2
The Dalles, OR654.3469
St. Ghislain, Belgium714.4450.8
Montgomery County, TN499.5424.7
Eemshaven, Netherlands532.2405.7
Douglas County, GA440.6367.1
Lockbourne, OH460.8359.5
Lenoir, NC378.3344.3
Bristow, VA359.6267.6
Henderson, NV401.7239.4
Midlothian, TX263.6220.2
Sterling, VA258.4199.8
Leesburg, VA238.1190.7
Omaha, NE241.8183.9
Jackson County, AL191173.6
Quilicura, Chile278.2143
Lancaster, OH307.1135.8
Inzai, Japan94.673.2
Fredericia, Denmark88.871.8
Ashburn, VA76.553.2
Red Oak, TX6750.4
New Haven, IN62.237.8
Mesa, AZ19.49.7
Middenmeer, Netherlands13.69.3
Storey County, NV [233]66.76.7
Hanau, Germany3.41.9
Hamina, Finland4.30.4
Wilmer, TX [235]2.60.3
Frankfurt, Germany1.20.2
Sydney, Australia [234]1.40.2
Dublin, Ireland [226]0.50.1
Montreal, Canada [228]0.30.1
Pflugerville, TX [229]0.40.1
Phoenix, AZ [230]0.50.1
San Bernardo, Chile [231]0.90.1
Winschoten, Netherlands0.10.05

Source: Google 2026 Environmental Report, page 97; methodology, page 87. Download all rows and source footnote references.

08What we know

The missing part of the picture.

Epoch estimates that its inventory covers 45% of deployed global AI compute, with a 90% uncertainty interval of 30–78%. This does not tell us what percentage of the world’s projects we have found. Large sites carry much more compute than small ones.

100 squares illustrate Epoch’s central estimate of 45 percent global AI compute coverage, with 55 percent outside its inventory. Its 90 percent uncertainty interval is 30 to 78 percent. Project-count coverage is unknown.100 squares illustrate Epoch’s central estimate of 45 percent global AI compute coverage, with 55 percent outside its inventory. Its 90 percent uncertainty interval is 30 to 78 percent. Project-count coverage is unknown.
NEW CONSENSUS · AI BUILD-OUTDownload SVGDownload PNG

Public but not yet assembled. More sites can be found in planning records, operator disclosures and regional inventories. Missing from this sample does not mean secret.

Known sites, missing measurements. Acreage, annual electricity and water are often unavailable on matching boundaries. Blank fields must not become zeros.

Source: Epoch AI methodology. We do not extrapolate a world project count from the number of sites in this selected sample.

09Explore the records

Find a site. Compare its scale.

All 96 records are available here, including those without positive current capacity. Open a row for its reported location and the meaning of its status.

96 matching sites · November 1, 2026 estimates

Cost is a model based on IT power, in 2025 dollars. H100 equivalents describe theoretical computing performance, not physical chip counts. Bar lengths show IT power on a common scale.

METHODS & DOWNLOADS

An open research project.

Our working scope is the worldwide buildout since January 2023, including completed campuses, expansions and AI conversions. Earlier infrastructure provides a baseline; future announcements remain separate. This edition is a documented sample and historical context, not a complete account of every boom-era project.

The charts deliberately keep different populations apart. A Google water-reporting location is not automatically the same boundary as an Epoch AI site. A country without a record is not assigned zero infrastructure. Figures describe their own evidence date and scope.

Research and graphics: New Consensus. Site and timeline data: Epoch AI, used with attribution under its Creative Commons Attribution license. Water: Google and IEA. Land: Hines Research, Louisiana Economic Development and Microsoft. Global electricity: IEA. City benchmarks: US Census, NYC DEP and NYC Comptroller. Map boundaries: Natural Earth, public domain. Published November 2026. Sources and snapshots are fixed; this page is not a live feed.